Australian Olympic champion Cate Campbell upheld Fina’s vote to limit transgender women from participating in elite women’s swimming competitions. ..
Fina’s historic decision also sparked criticism. The policy shift has been criticized by transgender advocates, and swimmer Maddy Groves described it as “discriminatory and unscientific.”
At the World Championships in Budapest on Monday, 71% of all 152 federations of the world’s governing bodies will allow male-to-female transgender athletes to compete in the women’s category only if they have no experience. I agreed with the new draft rule of becoming. The physical part of male puberty.
We also promised to establish a working group to establish an “open” category for transgender women who do not meet the new standards for racing as women.
Prior to voting, Fina heard evidence from elite female athletes, including scientists, lawyers and Campbell.
In his speech, Campbell said he believed in inclusion and recalled moving from Malawi to Australia at the age of nine. She said four Olympic gold medalists that transgender and gender-diversified people “want to be part of a wider swimming community.”
But in the end, the female fight “included in sports and considered equal” is only possible due to differences in gender categories, and removing it is “female athletes everywhere”. Will hurt you, “she said.
“We meet you, take good care of you, and accept you,” Campbell told Congress. “But my role is also to ask our world governing body, Fina, to stand up here to investigate, deliberate and support the foundations of fairness in the competition of elite women.
“And it afflicts me that this part of my role can hurt, infuriate, and potentially marginalize people from the trans-community that has already reached its limits.
“Believe me, I’ve been working hard with myself for a long time on what to say and what to do. My actions and words are the transgender women’s community no matter what I say. We know that it offends some people, whether it’s the cisgender women’s community or not.
“But I ask everyone to breathe in and absorb before they react. Listen to science and professionals. Listening to the people standing here, inclusion and fairness. Tell us how difficult it was to achieve both. “
“It is undisputed that men and women are physiologically different. We are just beginning to investigate and understand the origin of these physiological differences and the sustained effects of exposure to different hormones.
“Women who have long fought, have difficulty participating in sports and have been considered equal can only do so because of differences in gender categories. Removing that distinction is a female athlete everywhere. Will cause damage to. “
Groves tweeted her views on Monday, partially quoting the end of Campbell’s speech. Children of old immigrants from Africa did them all years ago. “
Groves replied: Is it okay to expel a group that has already reached its limit? I really accept it.
“Swimming already has people of different genders, but I don’t think they are well accepted. [right now].. Shame everyone who supports this discriminatory and unscientific decision. “
Just.Equal, a group of LGBTIQ lobbying, advocacy and campaigns, has called on Fina to “reconsider their decisions.”
“The decision to isolate transgender women in their lanes in the pool means they can’t compete at the elite level because they compete with them,” said Just. Equal, Advisor of Sally Goldner. Says.
“We question the process that took place in secret and ask if transgender people were consulted about their lives or if this decision was imposed on us without consultation.”
Conversely, Swimming Australia is committed to creating a “comprehensive process” in formulating its policies, the clarity it provides in connection with all FINA-recognized competitions and world records, and its commitment to create open competition categories. , Praised Fina.
“Swimming Australia supports a fair and equitable competitive environment for all athletes at a high performance level and we believe this new policy reflects that position,” he said in a statement.
“We also firmly believe in the inclusiveness and opportunity for all athletes to experience the sport of swimming in a way that matches gender identity and expression. Learn and educate the right balance in this area. It is our responsibility and our commitment to continue. “
“I am grateful for the final decision,” Seabaum said. “We have a direction,” she told Nine Network. “We’re not saying no to transgender athletes, we’re saying yes. We’re going to create a category for you.”
According to Seebohm, swimmers found it difficult to publicly talk about “such a difficult topic.” “You’re scared of cancel culture, right? That’s what it is now. If you say one wrong thing, that’s it,” she said.
“I think it was a problem for an Australian athlete to say,’Let’s get up.’ We all feel the same. We were all scared and just couldn’t say anything in the first place. “
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese provided implicit support and criticized the coalition’s treatment of trans women’s debate in sports in the last election.
“This is one of the reasons … there could have been no attempt to make this a political issue during the last federal election campaign,” Albanese said. “The guidelines make it very clear that it depends on the sports organization. They make their decisions based on their evaluation, and it is appropriate. Vulnerable people should not be used. Put them in a situation where one or one side of politics seeks a political advantage over it. “