Met was not good. The treatment of the English team and Gareth Southgate by their own fans at Molineux on Tuesday was noisy, consistent and, in the words of the people there, quite “unpleasant”. There was a debate about whether it was right or wrong (full disclosure: I’m in the wrong wrong camp). But you may need to wonder a little more about why it happened in the first place.
First, and most obviously, the performance was just poor. From Aaron Ramsdale’s goalkeeper to John Stones’ defense, Bukayo Saka is away from all yards, and Harry Kane ridiculed himself in an attempt to win a second soft penalty for an international break. But none of them were good for the eyes. As Southgate admitted, the English team’s expectations were high and they couldn’t live up to their expectations in more than one international team in Molino.
Next is the relationship with Southgate itself. There may be English supporters who dislike managers because they support kneeling. Not only did he defend his decision to protest systematic racism, but he argued loudly. If there is no one else, the Minister of Interior can imagine that it might have been postponed.
Then there’s the debate about handbrake, boring football, and the failure to get the most out of the £ 100 million Manchester City team player Jack Grealish. This is a legitimate complaint (if you’re wrong with someone else, that is, I’m wrong) and has been touted on talk radio and social media for over a year. It was always going to foam at some point. And some of this idea (especially a bit boring?) Looks pretty contagious – even 2,000 kids say it’s appropriate to boo after a 0-0 draw with Italy. felt.
We’re past the peak waistcoat, which certainly seems. But it’s also worth noting that the Gareth Southgate celebration was genuine and lasted for at least two years. It was an almost unusual kind of treatment for British managers of any shape or shape. Ask Graham Taylor if he appreciated such hero worship, and certainly didn’t like it.
Southgate has long existed enough for fans to not only understand the limits, but also to compare and contrast him with other successful football managers in the country. Simon Chadwick is a world-class professor of sports at Emryon Business School and a provocative thinker about games, so he frequently appears in articles like this. He observes that Southgate may be one of them, but he is not yet Pep Guardiola or Jurgen Klopp.
“Currently, when we think of the top two teams in Manchester City and Liverpool, they share a philosophy that is highly based on passionate performance,” says Chadwick. “Especially Klopp embodies almost everyone’s desire to be a football coach. He seems to really care because he’s really in tune with his fans and players.
“In terms of personality and approach, Southgate seems to be an outdated person. He has a disinfected approach to management, which in English may have been accepted back ten years ago. But Premier League football has overtaken him. What Guardiola and Klopp are doing and infiltrating football observers and fans, he runs up and down the touchline and jumps in the air. And you have to see them screaming, going and getting drunk. “
Chadwick’s insights lead to another idea of identity. The loud boos of the team you are supposed to support are rarely limited to the national team. Not surprisingly, the booing of the average Premier League XI is a source of frustration for some (me!). This activity can be seen as revealing the distance between fans and high-paying players. Nothing but perfection can justify a mind-boggling wage. It’s also possible that all failures are personally perceived because the bonds are so strong that they invest so much in their fan identity. This is even more complicated in England. It is your country, not just you, that is being neglected.
Without the digital pieces of the puzzle, it wouldn’t be 2022. There is an argument that the lack of abstinence common to online exchanges pervades the real world. Southgate and his subordinates just actually received what they got on Twitter. Chadwick understands that, but understands it as part of the basic premise of the modern Internet. There, as consumers, we have the ability to comment on the work of others.
“We’re all online collaborators on Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok,” says Chadwick. “We live in an era of contribution. We are co-creators of the product. If one element of the product, the on-field game, does not meet the standards, the quality of experience we are gaining. By reflecting the lowness of the product, we contribute to the further creation of the product. We live in an experiential economy and know that we oppose and complain about football on social media. What is happening is that co-creation of such experiences is beginning to occur in stadiums. “
You may disagree with all or part of these ideas. There are also other possible explanations (sick of all being one, not just football). If too many boos are bad, you need to ask why it’s happening in order to better understand it. In other words, if you agree that it’s bad in the first place.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 300 words and consider publishing it, please email it to email@example.com.